EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING POLICYIN ANAMBAS ISLANDS REGENCY

Harry NENOBAIS; Virginiawan VIRGINIAWAN; M. Hanan RAHMADI

doi:10.33068/iccd.v7i1.941

Harry NENOBAIS Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)
Virginiawan VIRGINIAWAN Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)
M. Hanan RAHMADI Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33068/iccd.v7i1.941

Keywords: Policy Evaluation, Planning Development

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the result of Kepulauan Anambas policy evaluation and also the dimension of planning development in 2022. This research was used William N Dunn evaluation criteria (2003) as the theory. Case study was used as observation approach. Data and information were collected from observation, interview, documentation, and literature study. All data were analyzed by using qualitative technique. Based on the result of this research, the conclusion is in the effectivity dimension, contribution of HDI (Human Development Index) indicator (12.11%), poverty (-110.47%), and gini ratio (-20.00%) were not effective for the Mid-Term Regional Development Plan (RPJMD). The efficient dimension reach 105% which is in the range of not efficient. Adequacy dimension, poverty level reach 7.51% and became the year of the highest poverty level. To decrease unemployment our government was recruiting the temporary workers massively. The equity dimension, development planning policies are not evenly distributed due to the lack of synchronization of data on the results of regional development control and evaluation, programs/activities are not aligned with regional strategic targets. For responsiveness dimension, there are only 6 (six) proposals accommodated in the Regional Budget (APBD). In the dimension of appropriateness, development planning policies are not appropriate due to inconsistencies, the formulation of strategic targets is not yet results-oriented, and the low value of the planning and budgeting area. Recommendations for improvement include adjusting targets and reformulating policies, prioritizing creative financing, encouraging ease of business and access to capital, compiling Standard Unit Price (SSH) and Standard Spending Analysis (ASB) at the planning stage, accommodating sub-district development planning deliberations (musrenbang) proposals, and formulating policies by paying attention to applicable regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.